As Masters Athletes we are all too aware that recovery is key, but ensuring this is achieved is often neglected. And as I refuse to stop training hard, I need to up my recovery game and searching around I came across a great article on the 100 point recovery strategy, and I have tweaked and placed into my own programme now. And I hope you can see the benefit too.
It has long been recognized that without adequate recovery, an athlete will not achieve his or her full performance potential due to the accumulation of progressive fatigue, often termed overtraining syndrome. Therefore, optimizing recovery is an essential component of the overall training plan. Recovery strategies such as compression therapy, nutrition and hydration, hydrotherapy and water immersion, massage and myofascial release, athlete self-monitoring, and lifestyle factors have been recommended. The purpose of this report is to describe the implementation of a 100-point weekly recovery checklist. Readers are referred to other reviews for aspects of recovery that are not addressed by this report.
100-Point Weekly Recovery Checklist
The 100-point weekly recovery checklist was developed for the Indonesian Olympic Team to use during preparation for the Beijing Olympic Games. The training philosophy employed by the national coaches was that of high volume, which was consistent among the coaches of 16 sports (archery, swimming, diving, taekwondo, boxing, weightlifting, cycling, shooting, indoor volley, beach volley, canoeing, rowing, sailing, tennis, badminton, and athletics). Little emphasis was placed on optimizing athlete recovery, due to a lack of recovery knowledge, facilities, and equipment. The primary goal was to develop a “practical approach to recovery” that could easily be implemented by ATs. A weekly recovery checklist was developed that gave a numerical recovery goal per week (i.e., 100 points) to motivate the athletes to engage in self-initiated, proactive recovery strategies. Proactive recovery has been defined as self-initiated recovery strategies that are a planned and systematic part of the training program. Following consultation with sports medicine clinicians, four proactive recovery focus areas were adapted from the work of Jeffreys and implemented (Table 1). Clinician involvement in the process of selecting the recovery focus areas helped to educate them and facilitated successful implementation of the program.
Numerical Recovery Point Value
The numerical recovery point value for each recovery modality is presented in Table 2. Determination of point value was based on (a) the effectiveness of the recovery modality (research evidence supporting its use) and (b) the level of athlete engagement required for its implementation (self-initiated, proactive recovery). Thus, the numerical recovery point value represents a combination of evidence for modality effectiveness and degree of athlete engagement in implementation.
To reduce the stress/fatigue state and to optimize recovery, the elite athletes were encouraged to achieve 100 points on the weekly recovery checklist. The athletes were encouraged to select two or more daily recovery strategies (Table 2), with strategies from each recovery focus area used at some point during the week. Check- list instructions are outlined in Table 3. An example of how an athlete may implement proactive recovery strategies to achieve 100 weekly recovery points is presented in Table 4.
Optimizing performance requires a balance between stress/fatigue and recovery, which is best achieved when the athlete is proactively engaged in the recovery process. Neural, muscular, substrate, and psychological recovery strategies were utilized to develop a 100-point recovery checklist. A three-part education process (ATs → strength and conditioning specialists → athletes) was found to be effective. The 100-point checklist provides a useful tool for ATs to educate athletes about the importance of post-training and post-competition recovery, and to promote self-initiated, proactive recovery strategies for maximum performance.
Use this Checklist to make sure you are getting the best out of your training by getting the best out of your recovery
If you’re looking to get some recovery items want to lean more check out my articles:
- Smith DJ. A framework for understanding the training process leading to elite performance. Sports Med. 2003;33:1103-26.
- Kentta G, Hassmen P. Overtraining and recovery. A conceptual model.Sports Med. 1998;26:1-16.
- Jeffreys I. A multidimensional approach to enhancing recovery.Strength Cond J. 2005;27:78-85.
- Gill ND, Beaven CM, Cook C. Effectiveness of post-match recovery strategies in rugby players. Br J Sports Med. 2006;40:260-3.
- Barnett A. Using recovery modalities between training sessions in elite athletes: does it help? Sports Med. 2006;36:781-96.
- Reilly T, Ekblom B. The use of recovery methods post-exercise. J Sports Sci. 2005;23:619-27.
- Budgett R. Fatigue and underperformance in athletes: the overtraining syndrome. Br J Sports Med. 1998;32:107-10.
- Duffield R, Edge J, Merrells R, et al. The effects of compression gar- ments on intermittent exercise performance and recovery on consecu- tive days. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2008;3:454-68.
- Ali A, Caine MP, Snow BG. Graduated compression stockings: physi- ological and perceptual responses during and after exercise. J Sports Sci. 2007;25:413-9.
- Kraemer WJ, Bush JA, Wickham RB, et al. Influence of compression therapy on symptoms following soft tissue injury from maximal eccentric exercise. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2001;31:282-90.
- Shirreffs SM, Armstrong LE, Cheuvront SN. Fluid and electrolyte needs for preparation and recovery from training and competition. J Sports Sci. 2004;22:57-63.
- Burke LM, Loucks AB, Broad N. Energy and carbohydrate for training and recovery. J Sports Sci. 2006;24:675-85.
- Wagner DR. Eating on the road: Practical nutrition strategies for the traveling athlete. Athl Ther Today. 2009;14:1-4.
- Vaile J, Halson S, Gill N, Dawson B. Effect of hydrotherapy on recovery from fatigue. Int J Sports Med. 2008;29:539-44.
- Wilcock IM, Cronin JB, Hing WA. Physiological response to water immersion: a method for sport recovery? Sports Med. 2006;36:747-65.
- Ingram J, Dawson B, Goodman C, Wallman K, Beilby J. Effect of water immersion methods on post-exercise recovery from simulated team sport exercise. J Sci Med Sport. 2009;12:417-21.
- Weerapong P, Hume PA, Kolt GS. The mechanisms of massage and effects on performance, muscle recovery and injury prevention. Sports Med. 2005;35:235-56.
- Barnes MF. The basic science of myofascial release: morphologic change in connective tissue. J Bodywork Movement Ther. 1997;1:231-8.
- Paolini J. Review of myofascial release as an effective massage therapy technique. Athl Ther Today. 2009;14:30-4.
- Jeffreys I. A system for monitoring training stress and recovery in high school athletes. Strength Cond J. 2004;26:28-33.
- Robson-Ansley PJ, Gleeson M, Ansley L. Fatigue management in the preparation of Olympic athletes. J Sports Sci. 2009;1-12.
- Nederhof E, Zwerver J, Brink M, Meeusen R, Lemmink K. Different diagnostic tools in nonfunctional overreaching. Int J Sports Med. 2008;29:590-7.
- Jeffreys I. Post game recovery strategies for rugby. NSCA Perf Train J. 2007;6:13-6.